The Vegetarian Resource Group Blog

Search Results

Bone Char-Free Vegan Sugar Update 2021: Domino Sugar, Florida Crystals, and C&H Sugar 0

Posted on June 10, 2021 by The VRG Blog Editor

By Jeanne Yacoubou, MS

According to their website, ASR Group is the world’s largest refiner and marketer of cane sugar. In the United States, ASR produces sugar under these brand names: Domino Sugar, Florida Crystals, and C&H Sugar.

In April and May 2021, The Vegetarian Resource Group spoke with Michael Burchell, Senior Director, Global Corporate Quality and Daryl Sabourin, Global Director of Sustainability, about sugar processing at ASR.

We learned that they currently use three different methods for cane sugar decolorization and purification:

  1. Cow bone char
  2. Ion exchange resin using a polystyrene bed (a non-biodegradable, fossil fuel-derived plastic)
  3. Granular activated carbon (GAC) using coal or coconut husks

ASR Group employs all of these methods at various refineries around the country.

Burchell told us that all three processes yield sugar of comparable purity and quality. Because each type of refining requires its own type of costly, specialized equipment that has a functional life of 50+ years, changing processing methods is not frequently done.

Baltimore’s refinery converted completely away from bone char filtration in June 2015. Burchell stated that concern about using animal material, especially in light of zoonotic diseases, was one reason they made the switch.

At the Baltimore location, Domino now uses granular activated carbon (sourced from both coal and coconut husks) and ion exchange resin for processing.

The Yonkers, NY refinery eliminated bone char in the ’80s. It currently uses granulated activated carbon, as does the South Bay, FL refinery which has always been bone char-free.

By contrast, the ASR sugar refineries in Crockett, CA and Arabi, LA use bone char filtration.

In the 1990s, 90% of the cane sugar industry was using cow bone char as a filter. Burchell points out, however, that the ASR Group was already 40% bone char-free in the ’90s.

Burchell estimated that today, 65% of all ASR sugar is bone char-free.

Burchell told The VRG that consumers can tell if a particular package of Domino Sugar, Florida Crystals or C&H Sugar is completely bone char-free if the lot number appearing on the label begins with 1, 4, or 6.

The carbon footprint of cane sugar

Michael Burchell informed The Vegetarian Resource Group that methane gas was the energy source driving the sugar processing in some refineries. And where granular activated carbon was used, coal was one of the source materials.

Both methane gas from fracking and coal from mining are fossil fuels. The burning of fossil fuels is the leading cause of our climate crisis.

We wanted to know more about how the fossil fuel (also called carbon) footprints of the three industrial methods for cane sugar processing compare. This information may help educate climate-conscious consumers when they are deciding which foods and beverages to purchase.

Burchell directed us to Daryl Sabourin, ASR Group’s Global Director of Sustainability.

Sabourin was unable to tell us exactly how the fossil fuel footprints of the three sugar processing methods compare. His company has not determined what they are. Sabourin estimated that a complete assessment would cost “at least $70,000.” It isn’t required by the government and no other companies are conducting this type of analysis.

When consumers want this information and believe the extra cost through raised prices (or tax credits?) are worth it, companies may start conducting this type of analysis. A complete environmental impact assessment, including a fossil fuel footprint analysis, would provide essential information about the total environmental costs of production methods. This information would allow businesses to transition toward using only the methods which have the smallest environmental and fossil fuel footprints and be leaders in sound sustainability practices.

Sabourin estimated that for the granular actived carbon (GAC) method, coal, itself a fossil fuel, would have a higher fossil fuel footprint than coconut husks. He also estimated that since bone char manufacture and regeneration require extremely high temperatures for extended times, the bone char method would have a higher carbon footprint.

For information on other ingredients, see https://www.vrg.org/ingredients/index.php

To find out about updates, sign up for our email newsletter: https://www.vrg.org/vrgnews/index.php

To support The Vegetarian Resource Group research, donate at vrg.org/donate

Or join VRG at https://www.vrg.org/member/2013sv.php

The contents of this posting, our website, and our other publications, including Vegetarian Journal, are not intended to provide personal medical advice. Medical advice should be obtained from a qualified health professional. We often depend on product and ingredient information from company statements. It is impossible to be 100% sure about a statement, info can change, people have different views, and mistakes can be made. Please use your best judgment about whether a product is suitable for you. To be sure, do further research or confirmation on your own.

Not all Cane Sugar is Processed Through Bone Char! 0

Posted on August 26, 2020 by The VRG Blog Editor

The latest issue of Vegetarian Journal features an article by The Vegetarian Resource Group’s Research Director Jeanne Yacoubou, MS titled Sweet Stuff: Not all Cane Sugar is Processed Through Bone Char. In this article you will learn which Domino plant locations in the USA still use bone char to whiten sugar and which don’t. See: https://www.vrg.org/journal/vj2020issue3/2020_issue3_sweet_stuff.php

To subscribe to Vegetarian Journal in the USA, see: https://www.vrg.org/member/2013sv.php

You can also subscribe to the Kindle version of Vegetarian Journal in the USA and United Kingdom. In the USA, visit: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07LBY2Y7K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1544727482&sr=8-1&keywords=B07LBY2Y7K  In the United Kingdom, visit: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07LBY2Y7K/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1544731957&sr=8-1&keywords=B07LBY2Y7K

Bone Char-Free Sugar from Florida Crystals® and Domino® Sugar 0

Posted on January 29, 2013 by The VRG Blog Editor

By Jeanne Yacoubou, MS
VRG Research Director

The VRG received an inquiry from a food company in January 2013 about vegan sugar defined as sugar that had not been processed through cow bone char. As we reported in a 2007 update, most United States cane sugar continues to be decolorized through cow bone char.

We spoke with two employees at C&H® Sugar in January 2013 who told us that most of their sugar not certified USDA Organic is processed through “natural charcoal” (i.e., cow bone char). Their Washed Raw Sugar has not been decolorized using bone char but it is only produced at its Hawaii plant and not available for widespread distribution especially in large quantities. However, the company is looking into purchasing cane sugar from other nations in order to expand production of the Washed Raw Sugar.

C&H® directed us to its sister companies: Florida Crystals® and Domino® Sugar. Florida Crystals sugar, both conventional and USDA Organic varieties, has not been processed through cow bone char. It is widely available in both large and small quantities.

Comparatively speaking, Florida Crystals® is more expensive than other sugar brands. For example, in January 2013 The VRG noticed several online stores selling their own store brand conventional sugar for approximately $3/4 lbs. while Florida Crystals® sugar sells for approximately $6/4 lbs. http://shop.floridacrystals.com/Natural-Sugar

Similarly, large quantities of sugar differ significantly in price. Conventional cane sugar at several online stores sells for approximately $23/50 lbs. while Florida Crystals® cane sugar sells for approximately $36/25 lbs. Florida Crystals® Demerara Sugar costs approximately $58/50 lbs.

The VRG spoke with Shannon, a customer service representative at Domino® Sugar. She explained that although most Domino® Sugar has been processed through cow bone char, it is possible to tell from the sugar bag label whether is came from one of two of its nine North American plants in which processing does not involve cow bone char. One of the plants is located in Yonkers, NY and the other is in Orlando, FL.

The first number/letter on the package code reveals the plant in which the sugar was processed. The number “1” identifies the Yonkers plant as the processing location. The letter “X” means that the sugar was processed at the Orlando plant.

The second number refers to the year in which the sugar was packaged (“2” for 2012). The third refers to the week in that year when the sugar was processed (“8” means the eighth week). The following number refers to the day of the week on which the sugar was processed (“2” refers to Tuesday). The following “A, B, or C” indicates the shift (morning, afternoon, or night) when the sugar underwent processing. The last number identifies the machine on which the sugar was processed.

Shannon could not specify whether sugar is only sold close to its plant of origin or whether it may travel long distances before being sold. Therefore, we cannot say that only stores close to Yonkers or Orlando carry Domino® Sugar that has not been processed through cow bone char.

In December 2012, The VRG reported that Australia has not used cow bone char to decolorize its sugar since 1990. Instead, Australians use non-animal activated carbon filters. The major Australian sugar company told us that they do not distribute to North or South America. http://www.vrg.org/blog/2012/12/19/non-animal-coal-filters-used-to-process-cane-sugar-in-australia/

The contents of this article, our website, and our other publications, including The Vegetarian Journal, are not intended to provide personal medical advice. Medical advice should be obtained from a qualified health professional. We often depend on product and ingredient information from company employees or company statements. Information does change and mistakes are always possible. Please use your own best judgment about whether a product is suitable for you. Further research or confirmation may be warranted.

To purchase our Guide to Food Ingredients, please visit our website: http://www.vrg.org/catalog/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=8

For information on food ingredients, fast food, and for other information of interest to vegetarians and vegans, please subscribe to our enewsletter at http://www.vrg.org/vrgnews/

To support VRG research, you can donate at http://www.vrg.org/donate

There are many ways to stay connected to The Vegetarian Resource Group!
Get our blog delivered right to your inbox: http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheVRGBlog
Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/thevegetarianresourcegroup
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/VegResourceGrp




CarbonFree® Domino® Sugar not Equivalent to “Bone Char-Free” 0

Posted on October 10, 2011 by The VRG Blog Editor

by Jeanne Yacoubou, MS

VRG Research Director

In September 2011 a VRG member asked us if the CarbonFree® Domino® Granulated Sugar, and sister brands, Florida Crystals® Organic Sugar and Florida Crystals® Natural Cane Sugar, meant that these brands had not
been filtered through cow bone char. She wondered if “CarbonFree®” implied that cow bone char, which is composed of carbon, had not been used during the sugar refining process to whiten the product.

Domino® Sugar has a FAQ page on its website, http://www.dominosugar.com/carbonfree/faq.html, which explains that its use of the CarbonFree® label relates to the products’ “carbon neutral footprint.” Domino® Sugar asked CarbonFund.org, a non-profit organization that certifies qualifying products as CarbonFree®, to perform a life cycle assessment (LCA) to determine “the products’ carbon footprint and greenhouse gas reductions” that existed because of company practices.

CarbonFund.org determined through a field-to-store analysis performed by The Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Management, that Domino® Sugar’s production and supply of renewable energy from “leftover sugar cane fiber and recycled urban wood waste” to power their sugar operations as well as some residential communities offset the carbon footprints of some of their products. Consequently, Domino® Granulated Sugar, and sister brands, Florida Crystals® Organic Sugar and Florida Crystals® Natural Cane Sugar became certified as CarbonFree®.

On its FAQ page, Domino® Sugar stated that the CarbonFree® label does not mean their products are “carbon free.” In fact, sugar itself, because it is a biomolecule, contains carbon. In terms of processing, only certified USDA organic sugar and sugar derived exclusively from sugar beets have not been processed through decolorizing filters, which, in most cases today, are composed of cow bone char.

For more information about sugar processing, interested readers may view our articles at
http://www.vrg.org/journal/vj2007issue4/2007_issue4_sugar.php and
http://www.vrg.org/journal/vj97mar/973sugar.htm

The contents of this article, our website, and our other publications, including The Vegetarian Journal, are not intended to provide personal medical advice. Medical advice should be obtained from a qualified health professional. We often depend on product and ingredient information from company employees or company statements. Information does change and mistakes are always possible. Please use your own best judgment about whether a product is suitable for you. Further research or confirmation may be warranted.

For more information on food processing methods and food ingredients and to purchase our Guide to Food Ingredients, please visit our website at
http://www.vrg.org/ingredients/index.php

For updates on ingredients and other information of interest to vegetarians and vegans, please subscribe to our free enewsletter at
http://www.vrg.org/vrgnews/

There are many ways to stay connected to The Vegetarian Resource Group!
Get our blog delivered right to your inbox:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheVRGBlog Visit us on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/#!/VegResourceGrp and friend us on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/thevegetarianresourcegroup

To support Vegetarian Resource Group research, donate at
https://www.givedirect.org/give/givefrm.asp?CID=1565




Natural Flavor in Kashi® Autumn Wheat Cereal Is All-Vegetable; No Bone Char Used 1

Posted on August 12, 2011 by The VRG Blog Editor

by Jeanne Yacoubou, MS

VRG Research Director

A concerned reader wrote to The VRG in June 2011 asking about the natural flavor listed as an ingredient in Kashi’s® Whole Wheat Biscuits Autumn Wheat® cold cereal. He asked The VRG to look into the matter.

We emailed and called Kashi® about the natural flavor in the Autumn Wheat® cereal and received quick responses as well as a follow-up call back by the same consumer specialist one day after our initial inquiry. Victor told us that the natural flavor in the Autumn Wheat® cereal is “natural maple brown sugar flavor” composed of “maple syrup and brown sugar.” Victor added that “barley malt flavor is added to enhance the flavor of both.” According to Victor, Kashi’s® Autumn Wheat® cereal is all-vegetable.

The VRG further inquired about the processing method for the brown sugar. Victor called me back to say that no cow bone char was used to filter the brown sugar.

We also received an email from Rick, another Kashi® consumer specialist, who wrote generally about Kashi’s® natural flavors: “The natural flavors we use in our products are a proprietary blend of plant and/or herb extracts, nothing from any animal, egg, or dairy origin. All of the ingredients are natural and do not contain MSG.”

A list of Kashi products that do not contain ingredients derived from animals, eggs, dairy or honey appears on their website. These are the following:

Ready-to-eat cereals:

  • Kashi® Autumn Wheat® cereal – organic
  • Kashi® Cinnamon Harvest® cereal – organic
  • Kashi® Island Vanilla® cereal – organic
  • Kashi® Strawberry Fields® cereal – organic
  • Kashi® Heart to Heart® Oat Flakes & Blueberry Clusters
  • Kashi® GOLEAN Crisp! TM Toasted Berry Crumble
  • Kashi® 7 Whole Grain Puffs
  • Kashi® 7 Whole Grain Nuggets
  • Kashi® 7 Whole Grain Flakes

Hot cereals:

  • Kashi® Heart to Heart® Maple Instant Oatmeal
  • Kashi® Heart to He art® Apple Cinnamon Instant Oatmeal

Wholesome snacks:

  • Kashi® Heart to Heart® Original Woven Wheat Cracker
  • Kashi® Heart to Heart® Roasted Garlic Woven Wheat Cracker

Frozen entrées:

  • Kashi® Black Bean Mango entrée
  • Kashi® Mayan Harvest Bake entrée
  • Kashi® Tuscan Veggie Bake entrée

For more information about ingredients, see:
http://www.vrg.org/ingredients/index.php
http://www.vrg.org/catalog/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=8
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/guidetoveganandvegetarianfoodingredients/id443466136?mt=8
http://www.vrg.org/mobile_apps.php

Your support allows us to continue this ingredient research and make
updates as new information arises. Please consider making a donation.
https://www.givedirect.org/give/givefrm.asp?CID=1565

The contents of this website and our other publications, including Vegetarian Journal, are not intended to provide personal medical advice. Medical advice should be obtained from a qualified health professional. We often depend on product and ingredient information from company statements. It is impossible to be 100% sure about a statement, info can change, people have different views, and mistakes can be made. Please use your best judgement about whether a product is suitable for you. To be sure, do further research or confirmation on your own.




Oligofructose and Fructooligosaccharides (FOS): Derived Mostly from Chicory Root or Cane Sugar 2

Posted on October 22, 2012 by The VRG Blog Editor

By Jeanne Yacoubou, MS
VRG Research Director

An online reader at www.vrg.org recently asked us if the oligofructose and the fructooligosaccharides she noticed listed as ingredients in a few cereal bars were vegan. She also wondered what these ingredients were and what they were doing in cereal bars.

Oligofructose and fructooligosaccharides (FOS) are soluble (i.e., able to dissolve in water) dietary fibers. A definition of “fiber” developed in 2001 by the Dietary Fiber Technical Committee of the American Association of Cereal Chemists reads as follows:

“Dietary fiber is the edible parts of plants or analogous carbohydrates that are resistant to digestion and absorption in the human small intestine with complete or partial fermentation in the large intestine. Dietary fiber includes polysaccharides, oligosaccharides, lignin, and associated plant substances…”

Natural sources of soluble dietary fibers include legumes, oats, citrus fruits, apples, and root vegetables. Bananas, garlic, onions, leeks, and artichokes contain high levels of oligofructose and FOS.

Because oligofructose and FOS remain unchanged in the body until they reach the large intestine where they undergo fermentation, they act as food sources for probiotic (i.e., beneficial) microorganisms. As a result, oligofructose and FOS are considered “prebiotics.” The fermentation of oligofructose and FOS yields short-chain fatty acids which aid in digestive health by lowering the pH, making it difficult for pathogenic bacteria (E. coli and Salmonella) to survive while the “good” microorganisms continue to live. There are some studies that report that oligofructose and FOS also lead to increased calcium absorption because calcium remains soluble longer at lower pH.

Oligofructose and FOS often serve as sweeteners, replacing sugar or used in combination with soy, whey, or artificial sweeteners to reduce the bitter aftertaste sometimes associated with these ingredients. They may act as humectants (i.e., retaining moisture) to keep the foods (such as cereal bars) pliable and chewy. Because of their low caloric value, longer-chain oligofructose and FOS are also used as fat replacers in a variety of spreads and dairy beverages.

Oligofructose and FOS are linear chains (known as polymers) of fructose molecules, usually between two to ten units. Fructooligosaccharides always terminate with a glucose molecule while oligofructose most often contains only fructose molecules but may end with a glucose molecule. (Fructose and glucose are sugars. Fructose, found in fruits, vegetables, and honey, is considered the sweetest of all natural sugars.)

What oligofructose and FOS have in common is a very specific type of bonding (beta (2,1) glycosidic linkage) between individual molecules that is not broken by human enzymes or gastric juices.

A common commercial source of oligofructose and FOS is inulin, a fructose polymer, (also referred to as fructan or a polysaccharide), containing between 2 and 60 units, derived from chicory root. Longer-chained inulins work better at replacing fats (in yogurt, spreads and dressings) while shorter ones function well as sugar replacers or sweetener enhancers (in chocolate or confections). They all may be purchased as dietary supplements.

One type of oligofructose supplement is branded Orafti™ by Beneo. Chicory root is used as their starting material: http://www.beneo-orafti.com/Our-Products/Natural-Food-Ingredients Inulin is extracted from chicory root by hot water. Then inulin is split into shorter fragments of oligofructose by enzymes. Activated carbon is used to decolorize.

Beneo’s oligofructose received Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status for use in infant formula by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2012. The document linked below details production methods. (GRAS status means an ingredient may be used in all food categories, following good manufacturing practices, with only a few exceptions).

http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodIngredientsPackaging/GenerallyRecognizedasSafeGRAS/GRASListings/ucm307720.htm

Another company, Sensus America, received similar FDA GRAS status approval in 2002 for its inulin product derived from chicory root: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fcn/gras_notices/219363a.pdf

The VRG contacted other companies in August 2012 about their FOS starting materials. Source Naturals, UAS Labs, Jarrow, and Food Science of Vermont use chicory root in their FOS products.

For more on oligofructose derived from chicory root:
http://www.nutraingredients.com/Research/Chicory-root-fibre-could-trigger-weight-loss-finds-new-research

It is possible to create in a lab through a fermentation process short-chain fructans between two and five units long known as scFOS. These are derived from sucrose (from cane or beet sugar) and consist of fructose chains that always terminate in a glucose molecule. Of the companies that The VRG contacted in August 2012, Nutricology and American Ingredients stated that their source is sugar cane. VegLife (under Solaray) told us “sugar” but could not be more specific. NOW Foods said “sucrose.”

Interested readers may note that cane sugar and sugar beets are the two leading sources of sucrose (table sugar). The large majority of sugar produced globally is derived from sugar cane. As The VRG reported in 2007, most cane sugar is decolorized using cow bone char filter. http://www.vrg.org/journal/vj2007issue4/2007_issue4_sugar.php

Readers who wish to learn more about inulin, oligofructose, and fructooligosaccharides may view:
http://www.foodproductdesign.com/articles/2007/09/the-ins-and-outs-of-oligosaccharides.aspx

The contents of this article, our website, and our other publications, including The Vegetarian Journal, are not intended to provide personal medical advice. Medical advice should be obtained from a qualified health professional. We often depend on product and ingredient information from company employees or company statements. Information does change and mistakes are always possible. Please use your own best judgment about whether a product is suitable for you. Further research or confirmation may be warranted.

To purchase our Guide to Food Ingredients, please visit our website: http://www.vrg.org/catalog/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=8

For information on food ingredients, fast food, and for other information of interest to vegetarians and vegans, please subscribe to our enewsletter at http://www.vrg.org/vrgnews/

There are many ways to stay connected to The Vegetarian Resource Group!
Get our blog delivered right to your inbox: http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheVRGBlog
Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/thevegetarianresourcegroup
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/VegResourceGrp




Is Organic Sugar in England and Throughout Europe Always Vegan? 0

Posted on June 06, 2023 by The VRG Blog Editor

By Jeanne Yacoubou, MS

The Vegetarian Resource Group received an email in April 2022 that asked if cow bone char processing is permissible in organic sugar production in any countries outside the United States. The writer asked specifically about sugar processing in England.

Cow bone char is the major way non-organic cane sugar is decolorized in the U.S. although other methods are becoming more common. Readers may find our 2021 article on cow bone char use in the U.S. helpful.

On the other hand, cow bone char as a processing aid is not permitted in USDA 100% certified organic cane sugar.

To find out about cow bone char in sugar processing in other countries including England, The VRG first turned to organizations that certify vegetarian and vegan food products in England.

The Vegan Society on Cow Bone Char

Since 1990, The Vegan Society has been certifying products as vegan. On their website is a list of all products from brands that they have approved. According to their Vegan Trademark Standards, this vegan certifier states: “The manufacture and/or development of the product, and its ingredients, must not involve or have involved, the use of any animal product, by-product or derivative.”

Here is our email exchange from April 2023:

The VRG: Can certified organic cane sugar in England be filtered through cow bone char to decolorize it or filter impurities and still be called vegan?

The Vegan Society: In the past, cane sugar used to be processed with bone char. It is something that still occasionally happens in the USA but is becoming less and less common. Beet sugar is generally speaking not processed with bone char and sugar grown in the UK is almost certainly not processed with bone char. Products containing sugar which are registered with our Vegan Trademark will be 100% vegan, and therefore will not use sugar processed with bone char. You can find all the vegan sugars we have registered with the trademark. Unfortunately, if a product is not registered with our Vegan Trademark, we cannot confirm that it is vegan as we have not seen a full list of ingredients and are not aware of the manufacturing process. For products not registered with us, our best advice is to contact the manufacturer directly and ask them where their sugar comes from and how it has been processed.

The Vegetarian Society of the UK on Cow Bone Char

The VRG also reached out to The Vegetarian Society of the United Kingdom. We wanted to know if they certify as either vegetarian or vegan products containing cane sugar that has been processed through cow bone char. This certifier offers two labels: one meeting their vegetarian standards; and the other, their vegan standards. The standards for both state that they will not certify: “any product that contains, consists of, or has been produced with the aid of products consisting of or created from, any part of the body of a living or dead animal.”

Here is our email exchange from April 2023:

The VRG: Can certified organic cane sugar in England be filtered through cow bone char to decolorize it or filter impurities and still be called vegan?

The Vegetarian Society of the UK: To check the products that are accredited by the Vegetarian Society, please follow the link here. If the product is not licensed to carry the Vegetarian Society Approved trademark, we are unable to verify its suitability for vegetarians. That does not mean the product is not vegetarian, just that we cannot confirm this. We recommend that you contact the manufacturer directly to confirm the product’s suitability for vegetarians.

The VRG: I notice on your sugar page that some products are vegetarian-approved while others are vegan-approved. I’m guessing cow bone char filtration is the reason for the difference? Here is our key question: Do you certify sugar that has been filtered by cow bone char as vegetarian or vegan? If you do not certify the products yourself, could you please connect me with the person in your organization who does?

The Vegetarian Society of the UK: We don’t accredit any sugar products that are processed with bone char. The only sugar that may be veggie-approved as opposed to vegan may be a product that uses honey or lactose as a “sugar” instead of vegan granulated/brown sugar. [VRG Note: Bolded by VSUK]

Cow Bone Char in Europe

The VRG wanted to find out if cow bone char is used to process cane sugar, either organic or non-organic cane sugar, in Europe. We started our investigation by contacting leading organic certifiers in France and Germany.

We first heard from Alessandro Pulga from Bioagricert. Here is our email exchange from April 2023:

The VRG: Can cow bone char be used to filter impurities in certified organic cane sugar in France?

Bioagricert: The adjuvants (including those useful for filtration) suitable in the transformation of organic products are listed in EU Reg. 1165/2021 ANNEX V.

The list indicates also other substances of animal origin (casein, isinglass, etc.) but NOT cow bone char. [VRG Note: Underlined by Pulga] To my knowledge, modern sugar refining techniques adopted in Europe no longer involve the use of bone char. It can be helpful to know where sugar is refined. Even if it is sold in France, the sugar may have been refined in non-EU countries. Organic certification should also protect in non-EU countries but certainly, in these cases, explicit declarations could be requested as a precaution.

The VRG: I’d like to reach out to the major sugar companies supplying Europe. Which companies do you suggest I look into? I understand they may be headquartered outside of Europe.

Bioagricert: I can suggest ASR Group, one of the main international companies. I advise you to also contact FLO and FLOCERT who certify producers of Fairtrade sugar (often it is also organic). They know all the producers in non-EU countries who also meet ethical requirements.

The VRG also received a reply from Bernhard Furtner of Control Union Certification in Germany. Here is our email exchange from April 2023:

The VRG: Can cow bone char be used to filter impurities in certified organic cane sugar in Germany?

Control Union: Organic cane sugar is not produced in Germany. Hence, I have no knowledge and we have no expertise on this matter.

The VRG: Is non-organic cane sugar produced in Germany? If so, do sugar companies use cow bone char as a filter medium? If not, what do the refineries use to decolorize it? If all of your sugar is imported, which company(ies) supply it? If you don’t know, could you direct me to someone who could help?

Control Union: Sugar cane is simply not grown in Europe. We grow beet sugar because it is adapted to European weather. Actually the European sugar demand was one of the main reasons of colonialism and slavery in the tropics and subtropic areas worldwide but mainly in the Caribic e.g. Brasil. It was Napoleon who promoted sugar production from sugar beet as a ration to the English sea blockade of Europe in war time. But now to your second question. I think today nobody uses cow bone char to a larger extent. You can try to contact the Brazilian Sugarcane Industry and Bioenergy Association. They should know everything about sugar and sugar cane.

The VRG: So you’re saying beet sugar is more commonly consumed in Europe than cane sugar?

Control Union: Yes, in Europe sugar cane is somehow “exotic” and much more expensive than beet sugar.

Cane Sugar in Europe

In Europe, most sugar is from sugar beets, not cane sugar. Here’s a graph that illustrates this point:

The European Commission states on its website:

“The European Union is the world’s leading producer of beet sugar, with around 50% of the total amount. However, beet sugar represents only 20% of the world’s sugar production, with the other 80% produced from sugar cane.

Most of the EU’s sugar beet is grown in the northern half of Europe, where the climate is more suitable. The most competitive producing areas are in northern France, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Poland. The EU also has an important refining industry that processes imported raw cane sugar.”

As The VRG previously reported, sugar beet processing never involves cow bone char. Only cane sugar may have been filtered through cow bone char.

So, if you are in Europe, it’s most likely that the sugar you buy and the sugar in European-made food products is from beet sugar. Cow bone char use is not a concern in most of organic or non-organic sugar grown in Europe. When in doubt, contact the sugar manufacturer. Have brand name and lot number ready so the bag of sugar you’re holding or considering buying can be looked up easily.

USDA vs. EU Organic Standards: Cow Bone Char

In 2012, after three years of deliberation, the United States and the European Union (EU) agreed that their organic labels would be equivalent. In other words, a product with a USDA Organic label sold in Europe would be considered as meeting European organic standards, and vice versa.

Then in 2020, the EU announced they would reconsider this equivalence because of stricter standards they plan on incorporating into their organic rules and regulations. The U.S. and the EU have until 2025 to reach an agreement.

However, when it comes to the use of cow bone char in cane sugar processing, The VRG noticed a key difference between the U.S. and the EU regulations. It involves the use of the term activated carbon and the sources used to make it.

How Are Activated Carbon and Cow Bone Char Related?

Although cow bone char is not, strictly speaking, the same thing as activated carbon, they are very similar. Cow bone may be used to produce activated carbon. When cow bone is heated at high temperatures under strict conditions, it becomes cow bone char (like charcoal). So, cow bone char may also be called activated charcoal which is another name for activated carbon. Coconut shells, wood, or coal can also be used to produce activated charcoal.

Thus, for instance, The VRG discovered in 2021 that ASR Group, a major global sugar refiner, may use animal bone for its activated charcoal, which it sometimes refers to as biochar or natural charcoal. In 2012, we reported that Australia uses coal to make its activated charcoal.

USDA vs. EU Regulation Terminology: Activated Carbon

First, it is true that cane sugar carrying the USDA organic label has not been processed through cow bone char.

The U.S. regulation reads: § 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic) substances allowed as ingredients in or on processed products labeled as “organic” or “made with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s)).”

  1. 2 Activated charcoal (CAS #s 7440–44–0; 64365–11–3)—only from vegetative sources; for use only as a filtering aid.

This regulation means that activated charcoal is permitted as a processing aid in organic foods if it is derived from plant sources (for example, coconuts husks).

On the other hand, the EU Organic regulations do not specify the allowed source(s) for activated carbon as a processing aid in organic food products.

ANNEX V Authorised products and substances for use in the production of processed organic food and of yeast used as food or feed

SECTION A2 – PROCESSING AIDS AND OTHER PRODUCTS, WHICH MAY BE USED FOR PROCESSING OF INGREDIENTS OF AGRICULTURAL ORIGIN FROM ORGANIC PRODUCTION

Activated carbon

(CAS-7440-44-0)

We know that these two sections of the U.S. and EU regulations are talking about the same thing (processing aids). Further, we know they are both talking about the same substance because the CAS numbers – unique, numeric identifiers used to designate only one substance – are the same in both regulations: CAS-7440-44-0.

Note that only the wording is different: activated carbon vs. activated charcoal. But as described in the previous subsection, activated carbon and activated charcoal are synonymous. The terms may be used interchangeably. More relevant for this article, they both may refer to cow bone char.

Based on these regulations, if you’re in a EU-member country and see an organic label from an EU-member country on a bag of cane sugar, you cannot assume that it has not been processed through cow bone char, despite the supposed equivalence of the USDA and EU labels as noted above. However, all European sources we spoke with – cited in this article – stated cow bone char is not used in Europe anymore in cane sugar processing.

Follow-up with Pulga of Bioagricert

Recalling from a previous section in this article featuring the transcript of The VRG’s email exchange with Pulga of Bioagricert, Pulga stated that EU regulations do not permit the use of cow bone char as a processing aid.

While it is true that the term cow bone char does not appear in the regulation, we noticed that activated carbon does. Use of activated carbon as a processing aid is permitted in organic foods. We asked Pulga to comment on this. Here is our exchange:

The VRG: You stated that EU regulations don’t permit bone char in organics…It seems organic sugar MAY be processed with cow bone char in the EU. Only if activated carbon is used to include bone char. Activated carbon is listed.

Pulga: The European organic regulation only admits vegetable carbon for use as an additive, activated carbon (vegetal or animal) is allowed as an adjuvant. Following past problems with mad cow disease is now increasingly of vegetable origin. In any case we ask for this declaration for our vegan certification scheme. In any case, [my contact] confirmed to me that SRB and most of the other sugar producers in the world can easily provide declarations about the non-use of adjuvants of animal origin. [VRG Note: Underline is Pulga’s]

So is there the permissibility of cow bone char as a processing aid in European organic cane sugar production?

A complete answer turns on the meaning of adjuvant. Clearly, cow bone char is not an adjuvant in the sense of an additive to sugar. However, if adjuvant is used to refer to a processing aid, then cow bone char could be permitted.

European Commission on Cow Bone Char in Organic Cane Sugar

The VRG reached out to the European Commission who wrote the organic standards for more clarification on cow bone char as an allowable adjuvant, but received a general reply that did not answer our question. For the record, here it is:

“Every country in the European Union appoints a ‘competent authority’ who is ultimately responsible for making sure that EU organics rules are followed. Usually these are either a department of agriculture or a department of public health.

This competent authority can delegate its role to:

  • one or more private control bodies
  • one or more public control authorities
  • a mixed system with both private control bodies and public control authorities.

Regardless of the system chosen, the competent authority is ultimately responsible for auditing the inspection system within its own area of responsibility.

Once a year, EU countries report to the European Commission on the results of the controls carried out on organic operators and on the measures taken in case of non-compliance.

Organic farming information system (OFIS)

The OFIS database contains ingredient authorisation and information on control authorities and control bodies.

The European Commission supervises EU countries to ensure that they fulfill their responsibilities. This helps build consumer trust, as EU consumers know that organic goods will have been rigorously inspected regardless of which EU country they originated in.

We invite you to visit this webpage to get more information.”
Bioagricert and Cow Bone Char

Taking the advice of the European Commission, The VRG analyzed Bioagricert’s organic standards, considering Bioagricert as an example of a “control body.”

Interestingly, cow bone char does not appear in the Bioagricert standards, even in the list of filtration aids that are excluded: “filtration aids with gelatin, egg white (from battery farms), fish glue or cases derived from shells or crabs.” [VRG note: This list is likely for filtration aids in wine production.] The rules for “the preparation of vegetarian products” state “products containing ingredients derived from meat or bones” are excluded. Apparently, cow bone char would be excluded.

For vegan products, the terminology gets closer to a reference to cow bone char. Coals of animal origin are listed as non-compliant substances. So, again, cow bone char could not be used in the processing of organic cane sugar.

However, Bioagricert regulations also states: “IT IS FORBIDDEN to use any substance, ingredient, additive or adjuvant or derivative of animal origin or which entails for its attainment procedures which provide, directly or indirectly, the sacrifice and/or mistreatment of animals.” Since cow bones used to make char are derived from “cattle that have died naturally in Brazil, India, Morocco, Nigeria, and Pakistan” as The VRG reported previously, this prohibition would not apply to the use of cow bones for activated charcoal production in cane sugar processing.

 How Common is Cow Bone Char in Cane Sugar Refining around the World?

In a 2012 article, The VRG reported that cane sugar is decolorized by activated carbon derived from coal in Australia.

Experts in England, France, and Germany interviewed for this article believe that cow bone char is not used in Europe today.

To confirm this, The VRG contacted cane sugar refiners around the world. We reached out to sugar refining companies in eight countries, and received replies from four of them. This is what we learned:

Canada’s Redpath: “We do not use animal products or by-products in our refining process for sugar, so Redpath Sugar products are suitable for vegetarians and vegans.”

Italy’s SRB: “Sugar extraction techniques have not included the use of cow bone char. It is a technological practice that has become obsolete practically all over the world.”

UK’s Tate & Lyle: “We do not use bone char in the processing of our sugar products.”

Portugal’s Sidul Açúcares: “We don’t use bone char in our sugar refining process in Portugal.”

The VRG also contacted FLOCERT in Costa Rica. They certify fair trade products. Here is our email exchange:

The VRG: Can cow bone char be used to filter impurities in FLOCERT-certified organic cane sugar?

FLOCERT: If the cow bone char is used in the process but it is not part of the ingredients, there is no need to report it.

The VRG: Is there any company that you certify (no need to reveal their identity) that uses cow bone char in their sugar processing?

FLOCERT: We don’t certify cow bone char or any animal product. You can verify our certified products here. However, it is possible that a company uses cow bone char or any animal-derived product in their process or ingredients. Please find how Fairtrade manage the mark in the products and the ingredients here.

The VRG Recommendations on Avoiding Cow Bone Char Processing in Cane Sugar

Based on our multi-year investigations, here are some recommendations to ensure your sugar is cow bone char-free:

  1. Choose USDA certified organic cane sugar made in the USA.
  2. Choose 100% beet sugar made anywhere in the world.
  3. In the UK, choose sugar products certified as vegan by the Vegan Society. Both vegetarian- and vegan-certified sugar products by the Vegetarian Society of the UK are cow bone char-free.
  4. In Europe, cane sugar processed by Tate & Lyle, Sidul Açúcares, and SRB are processed without cow bone char.
  5. Organic cane sugar certified in Europe by Bioagricert is cow bone char-free.
  6. For all other cane sugar, organic and non-organic, anywhere in the world, check with the manufacturer to be sure it’s cow bone char-free.

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR: For those who want to make the extra effort for issues around processing, we hope this information may be helpful. For others who are not at that point, don’t let issues like this get in the way of worrying about the macro issues that are important to you. Either way, we find it interesting how complicated food is in today’s world and how hard it is to really know company processes and regulations. Without putting barriers in front of individuals and food companies, we do advocate there will always be as much disclosure as possible, so individuals will be able to make their own decisions and choices within their needs and beliefs.

The contents of this posting, our website, and our other publications, including Vegetarian Journal and Vegan Journal, are not intended to provide personal medical advice. Medical advice should be obtained from a qualified health professional. We often depend on product and ingredient information from company statements. It is impossible to be 100% sure about a statement, info can change, people have different views, and mistakes can be made. Please use your best judgment about whether a product is suitable for you. To be sure, do further research or confirmation on your own. Also be kind when asking questions.

To support VRG research, donate at www.vrg.org/donate

Or join at https://www.vrg.org/member/2013sv.php

 




Is Molasses Always Vegan? 0

Posted on March 22, 2023 by The VRG Blog Editor

By Jeanne Yacoubou, MS

In April 2022, The Vegetarian Resource Group received an email inquiry asking about molasses processing and the use of cow bone char. She was confused because of conflicting information she had seen on the Internet.

On the one hand, our 2007 article stated that molasses is never filtered through bone char. The email provided a link that stated molasses may have been removed from the sugar stream during refining before and/or after the sugar had passed through a cow bone char filter to become whitened.

The VRG reached out to the blogger who had posted the article. We wanted to confirm the source of his information. We have not yet received a reply.

Response from ASR Group

Next, we turned to the ASR Group, a major manufacturer of cane sugar. We reached out specifically to the contact we spoke with at length in 2001 for an article on bone char in sugar refining. We have not yet received a reply.

So, The VRG called and sent emails or website contact form requests to other numbers, email addresses, or forms appearing on the websites of Domino Sugar, C&H Sugar, and Florida Crystals. All of these sugar brands are owned by the ASR Group.

In October 2022, we received an email reply from Kate Murrell, Sr. Inside Sales Analyst with ASR. Here is that exchange:

The VRG: Is conventional (i.e., non-organic) molasses removed from the sugar refining process before AND after the decolorization step?

Murrell: Are you asking how our brown sugar is made? We have different production processes at each refining location.

The VRG: My question is about molasses, not brown sugar.

During the sugar refining process, is molasses removed before the sugar is decolorized? Or after? Possibly both, depending on the refining process?

I’m trying to determine if the sugar from which molasses is separated had been in contact with cow bone char (when that filtration method is used).

I understand that molasses itself is not decolorized. I’m referring to the *raw* sugar (cane juice?) from which molasses is eventually separated. In that case, the juice had not been decolorized, according to my understanding. But, if molasses is removed at the end of the entire process, then the sugar would have passed through a decolorization step (possibly using bone char).

Murrell: Your question would be which of our sugars are vegan. All our sugar is vegetarian.

Some refineries use bone char, others don’t. You determine if sugar is vegan by our lot code. If the lot starts with 1, 4 or 6 it is vegan with the exception of brown sugar starting with 6.

Note: To this email, Murrell attached a January 2021 letter from Michael Burnett with the subject heading: “Vegan Statement – Baltimore, South Bay and Yonkers.” The letter stated:

“Our Baltimore, South Bay, and Yonkers refineries do not utilize bone char for decolorization. These refineries also do not use any other animal ingredients or animal by-products in the manufacturing process, and the products manufactured at these facilities are not tested on animals. Given these conditions, all of the products manufactured by these refineries qualify as vegan with the exception of Light Brown and Dark Brown Sugars made in South Bay which are manufactured with a sugarcane molasses from our Arabi (Chalmette), LA facility.”

The VRG: Do those numbers apply to molasses? Would you see them on the bottle?

Murrell: We do not sell bottles of molasses in retail; you would have to check with the manufacturer to see if it is vegan.

Inferences about molasses’ vegan status based on ASR responses

There is a relevant point that emerged from that email exchange that provide clues to answering the question of whether non-organic molasses ever passes through a cow bone filter (in cases when bone char is the filtration method) and so would not be considered vegan.

Murrell’s attached letter from Burchell states: “Our Baltimore, South Bay, and Yonkers refineries do not utilize bone char for decolorization…all of the products manufactured by these refineries qualify as vegan with the exception of Light Brown and Dark Brown Sugars made in South Bay which are manufactured with a sugarcane molasses from our Arabi (Chalmette), LA facility.” [NOTE: Bolded by The VRG for emphasis]

From the bolded part of Burchell’s statement, The VRG infers that non-organic sugarcane molasses processed in a plant that uses cow bone char filtration passes through bone char. So, this molasses would not be vegan.

By contrast, certified organic molasses, like certified organic sugar, is never processed through cow bone char, so it is vegan.

Response from GloryBee on molasses processing

The VRG confirmed our inference on molasses processing during a 53-minute live chat discussion we had with Phoenix, customer service representative of a molasses retailer, GloryBee, in October 2022. Here are selected excerpts from that chat:

The VRG: Has the sugar that is processed to make molasses been filtered through cow bone char?

GloryBee: You will want to go with the organic molasses as these products are vegan.

The VRG: So the non-organic molasses COULD have been from sugar processed through cow bone char? You state on your site: “The cane is harvested and then crushed into a juice. The juice is then evaporated through a boiling process which promotes sugar crystallization. There are several different varieties of molasses depending on whether it is from the first boiling, second boiling, or third boiling. Blackstrap is from the third boiling which is when most of the sucrose from the original juice has been crystallized and removed.”

GloryBee: [This] comes straight from our QA department for the organic molasses: “Product: Organic Unsulphured Blackstrap Molasses (GB#11065)
Vegan Statement
The product listed above does not contain any ingredient of animal origin and can be classified as “vegan.” The equipment used in the manufacturing of the product listed above are used neither for the preparation of animal products nor for products containing ingredients of animal origin. Bone char is not used in the production process.

This is the only product for molasses which is the organic that I am seeing that has no animal product in it.

The VRG: Is that on the bottle?

GloryBee: It is not labeled as vegan on the bottle.

The VRG: Does the non-organic molasses have a vegan statement?

GloryBee: From our QA department: “Conventional molasses: The product listed above is acceptable for vegetarians but a claim for vegan status cannot be made. Bone char is used in the production of this product as a processing aid to remove color and other impurities from raw sugar.”

The VRG: Does the non-organic molasses bottle say it’s suitable for vegetarians?

Glory Bee: This is not listed on the bottle.

GloryBee: If you are ordering from our website then you would want to ask for any documentation you would need. Otherwise if you are buying this from a local store they should already have these documents on hand and be able to answer any questions you have.

The VRG: Do you produce your own molasses or resell from another company?

GloryBee: This is a repacked item for GloryBee.

The VRG: Repacked from whom? May I contact them?

GloryBee: Unfortunately, we are not allowed to give out our supplier’s information.

[END of chat]

The VRG asked Phoenix at GloryBee for more information on the boiling process that she had mentioned earlier in our discussion. For clarity, we sent a link from The Sugar Association website showing a diagram of the cane sugar refining process. Here is the diagram (retrieved February 2023):

It appears from the diagram that bone char filtration would occur in Step #5. The boiling processes occur before then in Step #3. So, it would seem logical to conclude that all non-organic, sugarcane molasses is removed from the sugar stream before bone char filtration. If so, all molasses should be declared vegan.

However, both Burchell’s vegan statement and the GloryBee chat transcript provide details that suggest non-organic sugarcane molasses is not vegan. The VRG next turned to the Sugar Association for confirmation.

Sugar Association response on molasses processing

During Fall 2022 when The VRG was investigating the issue of molasses processing, we called and emailed several employees at the Sugar Association about their diagram. At that time, the diagram was like the one shown above except in one way.

The earlier one (no longer on the website) showed molasses being removed during sugarcane processing both before and after Step #5 when bone char filtration occurs. Specifically, it showed molasses coming off after boiling (Step #3) and at Step #7, after bone char filtration.

If so, the post about non-organic sugarcane molasses sometimes being vegan – but sometimes not – would be accurate. It would depend on when the molasses was removed during the refining process.

In January 2023, we checked their website’s diagram. This time, it showed sugarcane molasses coming off the sugar refining stream only at Step #7, after bone char filtration. In other words, according to the Sugar Association, non-organic molasses derived from cane sugar is not vegan.

To confirm this conclusion, The VRG asked two other companies. In October 2022, Imperial Sugar told us they don’t use bone char. One online business that sells molasses, told us that since The VRG is not a paying customer, our question isn’t a priority, so they may not get back with an answer. As of yet, we have not heard.

VRG recommendations on vegan molasses

Based on this investigation, The VRG recommends that if you want to be absolutely certain that molasses is vegan:

  • Purchase products that are certified USDA Organic. Cow bone char filtration is never a part of organic sugar processing as a decolorizing step. Thus, cane sugar crystals appear yellow or tan instead of white. Molasses from organic cane sugar is dark or light brown just like that from non-organic cane sugar.
  • Non-Organic molasses derived solely from beet sugar is also vegan since sugar beet processing does not involve cow bone char or any other animal-derived processing aids.
  • Non-organic molasses derived from cane sugar or a combination of cane sugar and beet sugar has gone through a cow bone filter if it were processed in a facility that uses cow bone char filtration. Not all do. Check with the manufacturer to be sure.
  • Interested consumers should note, as GloryBee stated above, non-organic molasses may be considered vegetarian even when cow bone char is the filtration method.

The contents of this posting, our website and our other publications, including Vegetarian Journal and Vegan Journal, are not intended to provide personal medical advice. Medical advice should be obtained from a qualified health professional. We often depend on product and ingredient information from company statements. It is impossible to be 100% sure about a statement, info can change, people have different views, and mistakes can be made. Please use your best judgment about whether a product is suitable for you. To be sure, do further research or confirmation on your own.




Aqua Cultured Foods Alt-Seafood is Truly 100% Vegan 0

Posted on September 23, 2022 by The VRG Blog Editor

photo from Aqua Cultured Foods

By Jeanne Yacoubou, MS

Chicago-based food tech startup Aqua Cultured Foods is innovating in the alt-seafood space with its truly vegan products created through microbial fermentation.

On the menu are fungi-based seafood analogs including “whole-muscle cut tuna and whitefish, popcorn shrimp, calamari, and scallop alternatives,” according to a March 2022 press release. Aqua Cultured Foods in fresh or frozen varieties, breaded or seasoned, are in the pipeline. The first commercial product, calamari fries, was recently unveiled.

The startup’s website states: “Aqua’s products contain no microplastics, mercury, pesticides, antibiotics, dioxin or PCBs” like conventional seafood may contain. The products are safe for people with seafood allergies. They are soy- and gluten-free.

According to Aqua’s website, their fermentation methods do not use any animal inputs, genetic altering or modification, and are non-GMO. “We’re not messing with its DNA sequence or altering its genetic material because we want to maintain that non-GMO status,” Anne Palermo, CEO of Aqua Cultured Foods, reported to FoodNavigator.

Unlike many other plant-based meat alternatives made from starches and protein isolates derived from soy, pea, or other plant-based extracts, Aqua Cultured Foods seafood analogs are mycoprotein (fungal) and produced by microbial fermentation. The resulting fibrous biomass retains “naturally occurring fiber, protein, and other micronutrients.”

In a 2021 FoodDrive article, Palermo described their fermentation method as versatile: “By varying pressure levels, humidity and gases during the production process, the same protein can be made into a flaky fish analog, meaty popcorn shrimp, or chewy calamari ring.”

Palermo further explained their technique in a 2021 Just Food article: “Basically, it’s a very new and different way of producing mushrooms. Rather than growing them on a solid substrate such as coconut husks or sawdust, we are growing protein in a liquid broth.”

A FoodNavigator February 2022 article states their calamari analog has, per serving, fewer calories, no sodium, more protein, and none of the saturated fat or cholesterol as conventional calamari. Unlike fiberless marine calamari, each serving of Aqua’s product contains 10-12g of fiber.

In a September 2021 FoodNavigator article about Aqua Cultured Foods, Palermo describes their alt seafood analogs as “tasteless.” So, adding chemical masking agents to hide bitter off flavors – like other companies do – isn’t necessary. As a result, their ingredient labeling and branding terminology will be simple and clean – but as of yet no details are available except that vegan omega-3s are added to the breading.

The Vegetarian Resource Group corresponded with Anne Palermo, CEO of Aqua Cultured Foods, about their vegan mycoprotein products via their publicist, Gary Smith, in August 2022. We wanted to confirm that absolutely no animal ingredients, including animal-sourced genetic material from a virtual DNA library, were used in their manufacturing process from start to finish.

Here are our questions followed by Anne’s responses:

The VRG: Can you please confirm:

  1. Your products contain no animal-derived ingredients.
  2. There is no animal- or dairy-derived genetic material in the microbes used to make your products. This includes no animal DNA (including genes coding for dairy ingredients) from a digital library.
  3. There are no animal- or dairy-derived ingredients in the nutrient growth medium. This includes cane sugar processed through cow bone char.

Anne Palermo: All three statements are true. Zero animal inputs in any phase of development and end product. When we are in full scale production (and at present), we will use 100% plant-based ingredients…our aim is to remove animals from the food system and that includes using inputs that don’t contain animal-derived ingredients or refined through the use of animal inputs.

The VRG followed up by asking for details on their market launch.

Gary Smith told us: “Aqua expects to do tasting events with some restaurant partners later this year (to gauge consumer acceptance), and then product introductions in markets via distribution partners in 2023…at first they won’t be going to grocery/retail, nor direct to consumers. Their plan is to sign agreements with foodservice suppliers.”

Stay tuned to The VRG Blog for all the specifics on Aqua Cultured Foods upcoming market launch.

The contents of this posting, our website and our other publications, including Vegetarian Journal and Vegan Journal, are not intended to provide personal medical advice. Medical advice should be obtained from a qualified health professional. We often depend on product and ingredient information from company statements. It is impossible to be 100% sure about a statement, info can change, people have different views, and mistakes can be made. Please use your best judgment about whether a product is suitable for you. To be sure, do further research or confirmation on your own.




Vegan Menu Options at Domino’s Pizza 0

Posted on January 06, 2022 by The VRG Blog Editor

By Jeanne Yacoubou, MS

After careful analysis of the posted ingredient statements for all menu options on the Domino’s Pizza website, here are their vegan menu items.

Vegan crust at Domino’s Pizza

The only vegan crust at Domino’s is the thin crust dough. All the others contain whey or honey.

As The VRG recently reported, the L-cysteine dough conditioner at Domino’s is microbial.

Which sauce at Domino’s Pizza is vegan?

Domino’s pizza sauce appears vegan. It contains sugar which may have been processed through cow bone char.

The VRG asked Spencer Breidinger, Manager of Global Product Quality and Regulatory Compliance – Supply Chain Services at Domino’s about its sugar and how it had been processed before arriving at Domino’s. He replied:

“Our sauce and seasoning suppliers have confirmed that bone char is not used in the processing of the sugar they source.”

Vegan diners should note that the Hearty Marinara Sauce contains butter and cheese.

Vegetarian patrons should be aware that the Spinach & Feta Pizza is made with Alfredo sauce which contains beef enzymes.  

Is there a vegan cheese option at Domino’s Pizza?

At this time, Domino’s does not offer non-dairy cheese in the United States.

The VRG asked Aubrey Yuzva, the Director of Menu and Product Development at Domino’s Pizza, if Domino’s had ever trialed non-dairy cheese in the past or had any plans to offer it in the future. Aubrey replied in November 2021 by email:

“We have not offered non-dairy cheese in the United States before, but other regions have launched or tested those types of offerings in the past. Unfortunately, I can’t comment on future plans around non-dairy cheese alternatives for confidentiality reasons.”

Note: The VRG reported on Domino’s Israel and its soy cheese debut in 2014.

The VRG followed up by asking where interested readers should check for updates on any non-dairy cheese trials or launches at Domino’s. Aubrey responded:

“Any official announcements would largely be made via press release, our website, social media pages, and TV advertising.”

If you would like to see vegan cheese at Domino’s, The VRG encourages readers to contact the restaurant chain directly through their website contact form and on social media. Express your wish to have a vegan cheese option at Domino’s. Be sure to specify your city and state to aid them in any trials.

For information about other chains, see:
https://www.vrg.org/fastfoodinfo.php

For information about ingredients, see: https://www.vrg.org/ingredients/index.php

The contents of this posting, our website, and our other publications, including Vegetarian Journal, are not intended to provide personal medical advice. Medical advice should be obtained from a qualified health professional. We often depend on product and ingredient information from company statements. It is impossible to be 100% sure about a statement, info can change, people have different views, and mistakes can be made. Please use your best judgment about whether a product is suitable for you. To be sure, do further research or confirmation on your own.

  • Donate

  • Subscribe to the blog by RSS

  • VRG-NEWS

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive recipes, ingredient information, reviews of new products, announcements of new books, free samples of products, and other VRG materials.

    Your E-mail address:
    Your Name (optional):



↑ Top